Counts and license facts from public records, not a review or rating. I have no partnership with Titan Solar; the name is as the utility recorded it.
Titan Solar at a glance
| Cities in my records | Phoenix, Tucson, Glendale, Surprise, San Antonio, San Diego, Gilbert, Chandler, Scottsdale, Fresno, Tempe, San Jose, Peoria, Chula Vista, Austin |
|---|---|
| Systems in records | 4,231 |
Titan Solar systems by city
| City | Systems | Years covered | Rank by systems | Share of city records | Earliest record | Latest record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix, AZ | 1,616 | 2022–2023 | 1 of 57 | 11.2% | 2013 | 2023-12 |
| Tucson, AZ | 546 | 2022–2024 | 2 of 31 | 10.1% | 2017 | 2023-12 |
| Glendale, AZ | 462 | 2022–2023 | 1 of 27 | 14.4% | 2014 | 2023-12 |
| Surprise, AZ | 320 | 2022–2023 | 3 of 17 | 8.9% | 2013 | 2023-12 |
| San Antonio, TX | 266 | 2022–2024 | 8 of 30 | 4.0% | 2020 | 2024-02 |
| San Diego, CA | 244 | 2022–2023 | 20 of 97 | 0.9% | 2020 | 2023-12 |
| Gilbert, AZ | 150 | 2022–2023 | 1 of 11 | 10.7% | 2014 | 2023-12 |
| Chandler, AZ | 140 | 2022–2023 | 2 of 11 | 10.7% | 2015 | 2023-12 |
| Scottsdale, AZ | 105 | 2022–2023 | 4 of 16 | 7.2% | 2013 | 2023-12 |
| Fresno, CA | 92 | 2022–2023 | 26 of 48 | 0.7% | 2020 | 2023-12 |
| Tempe, AZ | 91 | 2022–2023 | 1 of 7 | 11.1% | 2017 | 2023-12 |
| San Jose, CA | 60 | 2022–2023 | 28 of 44 | 0.7% | 2020 | 2023-12 |
| Peoria, AZ | 56 | 2022–2023 | 8 of 13 | 3.8% | 2015 | 2023-11 |
| Chula Vista, CA | 52 | 2022–2023 | 23 of 35 | 0.8% | 2020 | 2023-10 |
| Austin, TX | 31 | 2022–2024 | 10 of 10 | 2.2% | 2019 | 2024-01 |
Source: LBNL Tracking the Sun, utility interconnection records for ZIP codes around each city. How I count.
Where Titan Solar stands among local companies
- Phoenix: number 1 of 57; no company has more systems there, Freedom Forever (1,079) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2013 to 2023.
- Tucson: number 2 of 31; Freedom Solar (582) is one place above, Sunrun (533) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2017 to 2023.
- Glendale: number 1 of 27; no company has more systems there, Our World Energy (252) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2014 to 2023.
- Surprise: number 3 of 17; Sunrun (413) is one place above, Sunsolar Solutions (317) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2013 to 2023.
- San Antonio: number 8 of 30; Adt Solar (out of business) (296) is one place above, Solar Electric Texas (253) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2020 to 2024.
- San Diego: number 20 of 97; Solar Optimum Design Electrical (263) is one place above, Sunrun (227) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2020 to 2023.
- Gilbert: number 1 of 11; no company has more systems there, Fusion Power (143) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2014 to 2023.
- Chandler: number 2 of 11; Fusion Power (150) is one place above, Sunrun (102) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2015 to 2023.
- Scottsdale: number 4 of 16; Sunrun (111) is one place above, Freedom Forever (83) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2013 to 2023.
- Fresno: number 26 of 48; Better Earth Electric (113) is one place above, Soltek Industries (91) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2020 to 2023.
- Tempe: number 1 of 7; no company has more systems there, Sunrun (63) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2017 to 2023.
- San Jose: number 28 of 44; Nabu Energy (69) is one place above, Hooked On Solar (56) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2020 to 2023.
- Peoria: number 8 of 13; Freedom Forever (74) is one place above, Bright Home Solar (55) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2015 to 2023.
- Chula Vista: number 23 of 35; Solar Optimum Design Electrical (52) is one place above, Bear Mountain Solar Energy Chad Seaman Construction (46) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2020 to 2023.
- Austin: number 10 of 10; J C Energy Enterprises (32) is one place above, it closes the list. Its records in the area run from 2019 to 2024.
System size, batteries and leases
- Phoenix: typical system 8.4 kW against 8.8 kW for the typical company in Phoenix; 1% of systems had a battery. 10% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Phoenix records: 11%).
- Tucson: typical system 8.7 kW against 8.6 kW for the typical company in Tucson; 1% of systems had a battery.
- Glendale: typical system 7.0 kW against 7.2 kW for the typical company in Glendale; 0% of systems had a battery. 2% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Glendale records: 4%).
- Surprise: typical system 8.6 kW against 9.6 kW for the typical company in Surprise; 1% of systems had a battery. 48% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Surprise records: 29%).
- San Antonio: typical system 8.5 kW against 9.0 kW for the typical company in San Antonio; 5% of systems had a battery.
- San Diego: typical system 4.8 kW against 5.7 kW for the typical company in San Diego; 0% of systems had a battery. 4% of them were leased or under a PPA (all San Diego records: 18%).
- Gilbert: typical system 7.5 kW against 6.7 kW for the typical company in Gilbert; 1% of systems had a battery. 1% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Gilbert records: 2%).
- Chandler: typical system 7.0 kW against 6.9 kW for the typical company in Chandler; 1% of systems had a battery. 2% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Chandler records: 4%).
- Scottsdale: typical system 14.2 kW against 13.4 kW for the typical company in Scottsdale; 6% of systems had a battery. 14% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Scottsdale records: 8%).
- Fresno: typical system 7.8 kW against 7.8 kW for the typical company in Fresno; 0% of systems had a battery. 0% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Fresno records: 29%).
- Tempe: typical system 7.8 kW against 7.6 kW for the typical company in Tempe; 0% of systems had a battery. 0% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Tempe records: 0%).
- San Jose: typical system 5.9 kW against 6.5 kW for the typical company in San Jose; 2% of systems had a battery. 0% of them were leased or under a PPA (all San Jose records: 18%).
- Peoria: typical system 14.2 kW against 12.1 kW for the typical company in Peoria; 5% of systems had a battery. 11% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Peoria records: 10%).
- Chula Vista: typical system 6.1 kW against 5.6 kW for the typical company in Chula Vista; 0% of systems had a battery. 2% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Chula Vista records: 31%).
- Austin: typical system 8.8 kW against 8.0 kW for the typical company in Austin; 3% of systems had a battery. 0% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Austin records: 0%).
Offered a lease or PPA? Read lease vs buy first.
Before you sign
- License. Look the company up with the Arizona Registrar of Contractors and check the name on the contract matches the license.
- Run the quote through the quote checker and the list in how to check a solar quote.
Companies of similar size in Phoenix records
Freedom Forever (1,079), Our World Energy (1,074), Sunrun (1,013), Fusion Power (716), Elevation Solar (532), Sunpower (out of business) (526). Full list: solar companies in Phoenix.