Counts and license facts from public records, not a review or rating. I have no partnership with Freedom Forever; the name is as the utility recorded it.
Freedom Forever at a glance
| Cities in my records | Phoenix, San Antonio, Surprise, Fresno, San Jose, Glendale, Bakersfield, Austin, Scottsdale, Clovis, Peoria, Chandler, Gilbert, Tempe |
|---|---|
| Systems in records | 3,466 |
Freedom Forever systems by city
| City | Systems | Years covered | Rank by systems | Share of city records | Earliest record | Latest record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix, AZ | 1,079 | 2022–2023 | 2 of 57 | 7.5% | 2018 | 2023-12 |
| San Antonio, TX | 590 | 2022–2024 | 3 of 30 | 8.8% | 2020 | 2024-02 |
| Surprise, AZ | 452 | 2022–2023 | 1 of 17 | 12.6% | 2018 | 2023-12 |
| Fresno, CA | 367 | 2022–2023 | 10 of 48 | 2.9% | 2016 | 2023-12 |
| San Jose, CA | 197 | 2022–2023 | 7 of 44 | 2.2% | 2018 | 2023-12 |
| Glendale, AZ | 166 | 2022–2023 | 6 of 27 | 5.2% | 2018 | 2023-12 |
| Bakersfield, CA | 108 | 2022–2023 | 11 of 28 | 2.1% | 2018 | 2023-12 |
| Austin, TX | 93 | 2022–2024 | 3 of 10 | 6.7% | 2020 | 2024-02 |
| Scottsdale, AZ | 83 | 2022–2023 | 5 of 16 | 5.7% | 2019 | 2023-12 |
| Clovis, CA | 83 | 2022–2023 | 9 of 18 | 3.4% | 2018 | 2023-12 |
| Peoria, AZ | 74 | 2022–2023 | 7 of 13 | 5.0% | 2018 | 2023-12 |
| Chandler, AZ | 70 | 2022–2023 | 6 of 11 | 5.3% | 2018 | 2023-11 |
| Gilbert, AZ | 63 | 2022–2023 | 8 of 11 | 4.5% | 2018 | 2023-12 |
| Tempe, AZ | 41 | 2022–2023 | 6 of 7 | 5.0% | 2018 | 2023-11 |
Source: LBNL Tracking the Sun, utility interconnection records for ZIP codes around each city. How I count.
Where Freedom Forever stands among local companies
- Phoenix: number 2 of 57; Titan Solar (out of business) (1,616) is one place above, Our World Energy (1,074) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2018 to 2023.
- San Antonio: number 3 of 30; Freedom Solar Power Tx (602) is one place above, Greenstar Powerllc (521) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2020 to 2024.
- Surprise: number 1 of 17; no company has more systems there, Sunrun (413) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2018 to 2023.
- Fresno: number 10 of 48; Energy Concepts (411) is one place above, Green Convergence (302) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2016 to 2023.
- San Jose: number 7 of 44; Better Earth Electric (234) is one place above, Solar Optimum Design Electrical (186) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2018 to 2023.
- Glendale: number 6 of 27; Fusion Power (167) is one place above, Sunrun (163) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2018 to 2023.
- Bakersfield: number 11 of 28; Bright Ops (110) is one place above, Solar Negotiators (105) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2018 to 2023.
- Austin: number 3 of 10; Lighthouse Solar Austin (267) is one place above, 512 Solar (87) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2020 to 2024.
- Scottsdale: number 5 of 16; Titan Solar (out of business) (105) is one place above, Our World Energy (71) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2019 to 2023.
- Clovis: number 9 of 18; Tesla Energy (90) is one place above, Infinity Energy (70) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2018 to 2023.
- Peoria: number 7 of 13; Our World Energy (96) is one place above, Titan Solar (out of business) (56) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2018 to 2023.
- Chandler: number 6 of 11; Our World Energy (77) is one place above, Elevation Solar (52) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2018 to 2023.
- Gilbert: number 8 of 11; Sunrun (65) is one place above, Elevation Solar (39) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2018 to 2023.
- Tempe: number 6 of 7; Our World Energy (44) is one place above, On Point Solar Power (40) one place below. Its records in the area run from 2018 to 2023.
System size, batteries and leases
- Phoenix: typical system 8.4 kW against 8.8 kW for the typical company in Phoenix; 1% of systems had a battery. 40% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Phoenix records: 11%).
- San Antonio: typical system 9.1 kW against 9.0 kW for the typical company in San Antonio; 5% of systems had a battery.
- Surprise: typical system 9.1 kW against 9.6 kW for the typical company in Surprise; 1% of systems had a battery. 66% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Surprise records: 29%).
- Fresno: typical system 7.7 kW against 7.8 kW for the typical company in Fresno; 6% of systems had a battery. 51% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Fresno records: 29%).
- San Jose: typical system 5.4 kW against 6.5 kW for the typical company in San Jose; 2% of systems had a battery. 56% of them were leased or under a PPA (all San Jose records: 18%).
- Glendale: typical system 8.0 kW against 7.2 kW for the typical company in Glendale; 1% of systems had a battery. 25% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Glendale records: 4%).
- Bakersfield: typical system 6.4 kW against 8.4 kW for the typical company in Bakersfield; 6% of systems had a battery. 51% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Bakersfield records: 24%).
- Austin: typical system 8.0 kW against 8.0 kW for the typical company in Austin; 4% of systems had a battery. 0% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Austin records: 0%).
- Scottsdale: typical system 12.8 kW against 13.4 kW for the typical company in Scottsdale; 5% of systems had a battery. 41% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Scottsdale records: 8%).
- Clovis: typical system 7.4 kW against 7.5 kW for the typical company in Clovis; 5% of systems had a battery. 40% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Clovis records: 28%).
- Peoria: typical system 12.2 kW against 12.1 kW for the typical company in Peoria; 1% of systems had a battery. 26% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Peoria records: 10%).
- Chandler: typical system 6.9 kW against 6.9 kW for the typical company in Chandler; 0% of systems had a battery. 20% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Chandler records: 4%).
- Gilbert: typical system 7.2 kW against 6.7 kW for the typical company in Gilbert; 2% of systems had a battery. 2% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Gilbert records: 2%).
- Tempe: typical system 7.0 kW against 7.6 kW for the typical company in Tempe; 0% of systems had a battery. 7% of them were leased or under a PPA (all Tempe records: 0%).
Offered a lease or PPA? Read lease vs buy first.
Before you sign
- License. Look the company up with the Arizona Registrar of Contractors and check the name on the contract matches the license.
- Run the quote through the quote checker and the list in how to check a solar quote.
Companies of similar size in Phoenix records
Titan Solar (out of business) (1,616), Our World Energy (1,074), Sunrun (1,013), Fusion Power (716), Elevation Solar (532), Sunpower (out of business) (526). Full list: solar companies in Phoenix.